Laws of New York (Last Updated: November 21, 2014) |
SAP State Administrative Procedure Act |
Article 2. RULE MAKING |
Section 207. Review of existing rules
Latest version.
-
1. Unless the contrary is specifically provided by another law, any rule which is adopted on or after the effective date of this section shall be reviewed after five years, and, thereafter, at five-year intervals. 2. An agency shall submit for publication in the regulatory agenda published in January pursuant to section two hundred two-d of this article a list of the rules which must be reviewed pursuant to subdivision one of this section in the ensuing calendar year. In addition to the information required by such section two hundred two-d, for each rule so listed the agency shall provide an analysis of the need for and legal basis of such rule, shall invite public comment on the continuation or modification of the rule and shall indicate the last date for submission of comments which shall be not less than forty-five days from the date of publication. 3. If an agency determines that a rule subject to the provisions of this section should be modified, it shall publish a notice of proposed rule making for such rule, which, in addition to the information otherwise required by this article, shall include a statement setting forth a reasoned justification for modification of the rule and an assessment of public comments, prepared in accordance with subdivision four-a of section two hundred two of this article, which were submitted to the agency in response to the listing of the rule in the regulatory agenda. Where appropriate, the agency shall also include in its statement a discussion of the degree to which changes in technology, economic conditions or other factors in the area affected by the rule necessitate changes in the rule. 4. If an agency determines that a rule subject to the provisions of this section should continue without modification, it shall publish a notice to that effect, which shall identify the rule and the statutory authority for the rule, and include a statement setting forth a reasoned justification for continuation of the rule without modification and an assessment of public comments, prepared in accordance with subdivision four-a of section two hundred two of this chapter, which were submitted to the agency in response to the listing of the rule in the regulatory agenda. 5. This section shall not apply to any rule which was adopted as a consensus rule or as a minor, obsolete or invalid rule, or to a rule defined in subparagraph (ii) of paragraph (a) of subdivision two of section one hundred two of this chapter.