Section 200.60. Indictment; allegations of previous convictions prohibited  


Latest version.
  • 1.  When  the fact that the defendant has been previously convicted of
      an offense raises an offense of lower grade to one of higher  grade  and
      thereby  becomes an element of the latter, an indictment for such higher
      offense may not allege such previous conviction.    If  a  reference  to
      previous  conviction is contained in the statutory name or title of such
      an offense, such name or title may not be used in the indictment, but an
      improvised name or title must be used which, by means of the phrase  "as
      a  felony" or in some other manner, labels and distinguishes the offense
      without reference to a previous conviction.  This subdivision  does  not
      apply  to  an  indictment  or a count thereof that charges escape in the
      second degree pursuant to subdivision two of section 205.10 of the penal
      law, or escape in the first degree pursuant to section 205.15 thereof.
        2.  An indictment for such an offense must be accompanied by a special
      information, filed by the district attorney  with  the  court,  charging
      that  the  defendant  was  previously  convicted of a specified offense.
      Except as provided in subdivision three, the people  may  not  refer  to
      such  special  information  during  the  trial  nor  adduce any evidence
      concerning the previous conviction alleged therein.
        3.   After commencement of the trial  and  before  the  close  of  the
      people's  case,  the court, in the absence of the jury, must arraign the
      defendant upon such special information, and must advise him that he may
      admit  the  previous  conviction  alleged,  deny  it  or  remain   mute.
      Depending  upon  the  defendant's  response, the trial of the indictment
      must then proceed as follows:
        (a)  If the defendant admits the previous conviction, that element  of
      the offense charged in the indictment is deemed established, no evidence
      in  support  thereof  may  be  adduced by the people, and the court must
      submit the case to the jury without reference thereto and as if the fact
      of such previous conviction were not an element of  the  offense.    The
      court  may  not  submit to the jury any lesser included offense which is
      distinguished from the  offense  charged  solely  by  the  fact  that  a
      previous conviction is not an element thereof.
        (b)  If  the defendant denies the previous conviction or remains mute,
      the people may prove that element of the offense charged before the jury
      as a part of their case. In any prosecution under subparagraph  (ix)  of
      paragraph  (a) of subdivision one of section 125.27 of the penal law, if
      the defendant denies the previous murder conviction or remains mute, the
      people may prove that element of the offense only  after  the  jury  has
      first found the defendant guilty of intentionally causing the death of a
      person  as charged in the indictment, in which case the court shall then
      permit the people and the  defendant  to  offer  evidence  and  argument
      consistent  with  the  relevant  provisions  of  section  260.30 of this
      chapter with respect to the previous murder conviction.
        4. Nothing contained in this section precludes the people from proving
      a prior conviction before  a  grand  jury  or  relieves  them  from  the
      obligation  or  necessity  of  so  doing  in  order  to submit a legally
      sufficient case.